A Design Perspective

The Call of the Wild

Much like the constructivists of the 1920s, my experience at CED compelled me to pursue a fundamentally different approach to architecture.

t the time, I could not articulate why I felt compelled to bring my wife and newborn child onto the 1907 lava flow at the southernmost tip of the United States on the Big Island. The decision seemed irrational.

I justified this decision by claiming a need for land and a desire to emulate Chris Alexander’s approach, constructing a house in accordance with his timeless principles.

However, a unique phenomenon emerges when applying A Pattern Language: the methodology seems to respond and interact with the user.

Upon reflection, many years later, I recognized a rationale behind what once seemed irrational. At the 1976 UN Conference on Human Settlements, the concept of site-and-service projects for the developing world was introduced.

This represented a return to minimalist principles, now directed not at workers but at impoverished communities.

After returning from the conference, Professor Lerup posed a pivotal question: “If you had land, what would you build?”

Participating in the development of the CED Habitat Manifesto (1976) necessitated implementing the first recommended change to the CED curriculum:

  • To offer more substantive courses on the theory and practice of self-help housing both domestically and internationally.

Ultimately, my experience living in the Kau desert became my response. Through mindful self-reflection, I recognized that my coursework was entirely theoretical; I lacked a practical understanding of a minimalist site-and-service lifestyle.

Because there was a disconnect between theory and experience, Kau provided a form of “home ground”—a place where abstract ideas and projections could achieve tangible grounding and a sense of presence.

                                   Mexicali                                                                                  Kau